Occupancy · 03
City and micro-market
Occupancy is a portfolio number but it is decided street by street. Pick a city and every panel below — the map, the centre table and the funnel — recomputes against it.
Micro-markets loaded
40
6,605 beds across 8 cities
Requirements unserved
593
Across all micro-markets
Weakest micro-market
74.3%
Keshwapur
Empty beds worth
₹1.0 cr
Illustrative, at list rate
Bengaluru, mapped street by street
Schematic micro-market plot — switch the lens, hover for the economics
Occupied beds against operational beds in the micro-market. Measured from your inventory, not modelled.
Schematic. Node positions are approximately correct relative to each other within the city and are not to scale. Bubble area is operational beds, the number inside is centres. Not a boundary map and not survey data.
Pick a city
Every panel on this page follows this choice
Bengaluru occupancy trend
86.4%
▲ 6.3%7-period change
Bengaluru enquiries, 30d
863
Scaled to 40% of national beds
Reached and spoken to
528
Two-way conversations
Visits booked
75
142 beds filled
Bengaluru, centres
10 centres · 1,915 beds
| Cadabam’s Jayanagar | Jayanagar | 240 | 81.3% | 60 | ₹13,300 | 73 | |
| Cadabam's Indiranagar | Indiranagar | 105 | 85.1% | 22 | ₹11,200 | 87 | |
| Cadabam's Rajajinagar | Rajajinagar | 190 | 85.9% | 24 | ₹9,400 | 74 | |
| Cadabam’s Hebbal | Hebbal | 105 | 87.3% | 55 | ₹10,100 | 82 | |
| Cadabam’s Bannerghatta | Bannerghatta | 230 | 87.6% | 71 | ₹11,300 | 77 | |
| Cadabam's Kanakapura Road | Kanakapura Road | 200 | 87.7% | 63 | ₹13,500 | 88 | |
| Cadabam's Whitefield | Whitefield | 180 | 88.6% | 39 | ₹11,700 | 74 | |
| Cadabam's Sarjapura | Sarjapura | 160 | 89.0% | 70 | ₹9,600 | 84 | |
| Cadabam’s Electronic City | Electronic City | 185 | 90.3% | 68 | ₹8,200 | 82 | |
| Cadabam’s GBB Kanakapura | Kanakapura | 320 | 91.7% | 57 | ₹10,500 | 78 |
Ramp vs mature, Bengaluru
2 of 10 centres in Bengaluru are within their first 24 months of operation.
Bengaluru, by micro-market
10 centres · 1,450 beds · 86.4% occupied
| Micro-market | Centres | Beds | Occupancy | Rate/bed | Unserved | Competitor raised | Win rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kanakapura Road | 1 | 200 | 87.6% | ₹13,600 | 25 | 11 | 61% |
| Jayanagar | 1 | 90 | 83.2% | ₹12,700 | 26 | 11 | 53% |
| Whitefield | 1 | 90 | 85.3% | ₹11,800 | 7 | 23 | 48% |
| Kanakapura | 1 | 95 | 88.5% | ₹10,600 | 10 | 18 | 47% |
| Indiranagar | 1 | 105 | 85.9% | ₹11,200 | 21 | 12 | 48% |
| Hebbal | 1 | 105 | 84.7% | ₹10,000 | 14 | 13 | 40% |
| Sarjapura | 1 | 160 | 88.6% | ₹9,700 | 10 | 15 | 52% |
| Bannerghatta | 1 | 230 | 86.9% | ₹10,900 | 27 | 19 | 43% |
| Rajajinagar | 1 | 190 | 85.0% | ₹9,300 | 4 | 8 | 40% |
| Electronic City | 1 | 185 | 83.3% | ₹8,700 | 14 | 14 | 57% |
The comparison that matters
Empty beds versus unserved demand
Empty beds and unserved demand can sit in the same postcode and never meet. Most unserved requirements above thirty beds need contiguous space, and a portfolio can hold hundreds of empty beds scattered across four floors while turning away a single forty bed requirement. The map is coloured so that this is visible rather than averaged away, and it is the reason the unserved lens and the occupancy lens rarely agree.
Why rate is a lens
Occupancy without price is not a performance number
A central micro-market at 91 per cent and ₹25,000 is a different result from a peripheral one at 78 per cent and ₹15,800, and the second is not obviously the worse decision. Switching the lens to rate is the check on anyone who proposes to fix occupancy by discounting, which is the cheapest thing to do and the most expensive thing to have done.
What this city view is telling us
Trend, ramp mix and micro-market spread, read together
Bengaluru occupancy moved 6.3 points over the trend window
TrendRead this next to the ramp/mature split — a city with more growth centres should show a steeper, not flatter, curve.
Keshwapur is the weakest micro-market loaded
Micro-marketAt 74.3% occupancy it is the first place to check unserved demand and rate before assuming a demand problem.
Rate and occupancy do not always agree
YieldA cheaper micro-market can carry higher occupancy for the wrong reason — margin, not fill rate, is the number to defend.
Demo dataFigures on this screen are illustrative, from a deterministic model, for walkthrough purposes only.