Cadabam's Hospitals

Growth Pilot

Product · Sales copilot

CarePath AI

Scores every live enquiry against real inventory, commute isochrones, budget band and growth curve, then produces a ranked three-option proposal a rep can send in one click.

Enquiries matched

1,860

Last 30 days

Match accuracy

91%

4%

vs manual

Rep-accepted top pick

Avg time to proposal

4m

Was 6 hours

Visit conversion

+23%

vs manual routing

Matched proposals per week

8-week trend

W1W2W3W4W5W6W7W8

Match-score distribution

Share of proposals by score band

38%
90-100
29%
80-89
18%
70-79
9%
60-69
6%
<60

Enquiry source mix

Share of matched enquiries by channel

4

Channels

Website enquiry form38%38%
TPA / insurance referral24%24%
Physician referral21%21%
Walk-in / call centre17%17%

Enquiry-to-enrolment funnel

Full journey, last 30 days

Enquiries received3,120100%
All channels
Auto-matched2,87092%
Top-3 proposal generated8% vs previous
Rep-sent proposal2,34075%
Accepted top pick or edited18% vs previous
Site visit booked1,18038%
50% vs previous
Admitted / enrolled69022%
42% vs previous

Live match queue

Click an enquiry to see its ranked three-option proposal

Option 1

Cadabam's @ GBB Kanakapura · Tower A+B split

Best commute + branding floor

₹14,500/bed

Option 2

Cadabam's Jayanagar · L6

Backup, 8 min further commute

₹12,800/bed

Option 3

Cadabam's Sarjapura (pipeline) · managed floor

Cheaper but wrong city zone for HQ

₹10,200/bed

Scoring-factor weights

How the match score is built

Commute isochrone fit30%

Straight-line + transit time vs team home clusters

Budget band alignment25%

Enquiry stated budget vs live rate card

Layout / config match20%

Beds, cabins, meeting-room ratio requested

Growth headroom15%

Adjacent inventory available for 12-month ramp

Brand / community fit10%

Sector cluster and anchor tenant compatibility

Win / loss reasons

Cited driver behind accepted or rejected matches

34%
Commute won it
26%
Price won it
19%
Layout mismatch lost it
13%
No inventory lost it
8%
Slow response lost it

Unmatched demand

Enquiries the current inventory cannot satisfy

Unserved

112 beds · Kochi Kakkanad extension

No Cadabam's centre within acceptable commute band — routed to Expansion Radar.

Layout gap

40 beds · L-shape cabins, Chennai

Zero centres in city carry this configuration this quarter.

Budget gap

8 enquiries · sub ₹6,000/bed

Below list price floor across all centres — refer to Shared Room / Day Care Pass products.

How the matching algorithm works

Enquiry to ranked proposal

01

Parse enquiry

NLP extracts beds, budget, target city, layout needs and timeline from web form, email or WhatsApp.

02

Score inventory

Every live floor plan scored against the five weighted factors to produce a 0-100 fit score.

03

Rank top 3

Highest scoring options assembled into a proposal with pricing guardrails and fallback alternates.

04

Route and learn

Rep-accepted picks vs overridden picks feed back into the weighting model each week.

Copilot actions

What the matching agent recommends right now

Live
Send

Zeta Fintech · 120 beds

96 match score — proposal auto-drafted with Kanakapura split-floor layout, ready to send.

Review

Kite Studio · 18 beds

78 score — only partial layout available, flag for rep judgement before sending.

Waitlist

Vahan Logistics · 60 beds

54 score — no matching layout live; hold for Q3 Chennai release.

Escalate

Kochi Kakkanad demand cluster

112 unserved beds detected this month — surface to Expansion Radar for site scoring.

Matching agent insights

Emerging patterns worth acting on

  • Psychiatry inpatient matches converting best

    Working

    68% of psychiatry proposals are accepted without edits, vs 51% portfolio average.

  • De-addiction budget mismatches rising

    Escalate

    19% of de-addiction enquiries ask for a budget band with no available bed within 12km — flagged to expansion radar.

  • TPA referrals need faster turnaround

    Fix

    Average proposal time for TPA-sourced leads is 40% slower due to manual eligibility checks.